Excerpted from Howard Phillips Issues & Strategy Bulletin
of January 15, 2008
Excerpted from Howard Phillips Issues & Strategy Bulletin
of October 15, 2007
“Sophie Richardson, an Asia expert at Human Rights
Watch, an advocacy organization, said Mr. Bush was giving ‘an
enormous propaganda opportunity to an abusive government.’ ”
Source: From Sydney, Australia, Sheryl Gay Stolberg, The New
York Times, 9/7/07, p. A10
Excerpted from Howard Phillips Issues &
Strategy Bulletin of August 31, 2007
Excerpted from Howard Phillips Issues & Strategy Bulletin
of June 30, 2001
OLYMPIC KOWTOW TO RED CHINA BY BUSH
EVOKES MEMORIES OF HITLERS BERLIN IN 1936
"Picture this: Beneath a towering portrait of Chairman Mao,
brutal Chinese dictators bask in the warm glow of international good will as the
worlds top volleyball players romp across imported sand spread over Tiananmen Square
- the same bloodied site where government troops massacred peaceful pro-democracy
protesters in 1989.
"
A LEADERSHIP VACUUM IN THE OVAL OFFICE
"It is hard to remain neutral about the thought of bikini-clad
competitors high-fiving in the communist plaza where military tanks mowed down young
Chinese students carrying replicas of our Lady Liberty. But neutrality is the official
stand the Bush administration took this week. We decided not to decide,
said Richard A. Boucher, State Department spokesman. Chinese President Jiang Zemin no
doubt did some high-fiving himself when he heard the news."
"NEUTRAL" ON MORALITY, JUSTICE,
AND U.S. NATIONAL INTEREST
"How can we remain neutral - uninvolved - about Chinas bid
for Olympic glory while religious minorities such as the Falun Gong are persecuted,
repressed and tortured with cattle prods?"
SLAVE LABOR AND SYNCHRONIZED SWIMMING
"How can we remain neutral while dissenting journalists are shut
down, Internet cafes are raided and government critics have their tongues cut off? How can
we remain neutral while the Chinese government continues to operate slave labor camps in
open defiance of international laws?"
ACROBATICS AND ABORTION
"How can we remain neutral about rewarding China while
government-sponsored infanticide, forced abortions and a coercive one-child policy
continue to strike terror in the hearts of Chinese parents?"
ACQUIESCING TO ASIAN IMPERIALISM
"How can we remain neutral about a country that tried to subvert
our election system and continues a campaign of military aggression in Asia? Just this
week, The Washington Times Bill Gertz reports, Chinese warships menaced the
Spratly island chain near the Philippines. Chinese military occupation of the Spratlys
is part of Beijings strategy of expanding its empire."
U.S. CITIZENS IN RED CHINESE PRISONS
"And how can we remain neutral about Beijings Olympic
aspirations while its leaders hold more than 30 U.S. citizens in Chinese prisons, as well
as a growing number of Chinese-born scholars who are permanent U.S. residents and have
children who are U.S. citizens?
"These hostages are being detained by the Ministry of State Security on trumped-up
charges of espionage and have been denied any semblance of due process. This column
reported in March on one of those prisoners, American University professor Gao Zhan, who
hasnt been seen or heard from by her husband and 5-year-old, American-born son
Andrew in four months. The family had been on vacation in China and was preparing to
return to the United States when a group of 15 Beijing secret police in plain clothes
swarmed Andrew and his parents at the airport.
"
FREE TRADE DIDNT PROMOTE FREEDOM -
NEITHER WILL OLYMPICS
"How can we remain neutral while the Chinese laugh off concerns
about the human rights of their people and ours, and in the same breath argue that giving
the Olympics to Beijing will provide an incentive for them to change their ways? If three
decades of economic liberalization and free trade with us havent worked, who really
believes a candy-coated Olympics (replete with forced smiles and fake beaches and dead
grass painted green for show) will break Chinas chains?
"Whether China wins or loses its Olympic bid, it can already claim victory.
Neutrality in the face of totalitarianism is condonation clothed in diplomatic
cowardice." Source: Michelle Malkin, The Washington Times, 7/2/01, p. A16
BUSH ACQUIESCES TO RED CHINESE
SPONSORSHIP OF 2008 OLYMPICS
Steven Mufson writes (Washington Post, 6/25/01, p. 1) that
"The Bush administration has decided to remain neutral on Beijings bid to host
the 2008 Olympics, despite powerful appeals from members of Congress to oppose
Beijings bid on human rights grounds.
"The administration hopes that its neutral position will help defuse an issue
that China has called an emotional one for its people, officials said. A senior State
Department official said that awarding the games to China might even be a positive thing
and give China a powerful but intangible incentive to improve its human rights
performance and to exercise restraint toward Taiwan."
GOP CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP TAKES A DIVE
"At the same time, momentum in Congress to take a stand against
Beijings bid seems to be fading. Republican leaders might not bring to the floor a
House resolution opposing Beijings bid before Congress recesses this week,
congressional sources said. Congress will not return from recess until July 9, just four
days before the International Olympic Committee meets in Moscow to choose a 2008 site.
"Neutrality from the United States could boost Beijings chances of
hosting the games over its three rivals: Paris, Osaka and Toronto. Beijing is
considered the leading candidate and regards its selection as a matter of intense national
pride; Chinese officials have complained that U.S. opposition contributed to
Beijings failure to win the 2000 games.
"Responding to suggestions that the Olympics might help open up the political
system, [California Democratic Congressman Tom] Lantos said, it is idiotic to
argue that it is helpful to allow an authoritarian regime to bask in the reflected
glory of the Olympics."
NO VOTE ALLOWED IN CONGRESS
" I think Ive got the votes, Lantos said, but
he doubts the House leaders want it voted on. It would be a rather regrettable and
unfortunate phenomenon to appease Beijing by not allowing the voice of the Congress to
speak on this issue. " |